| 1866:
Italy Goes to War
By Mike Bennighof. Ph.D.
September 2007
Italy became a united kingdom in 1861 almost
exclusively through armed force — both
the actions of the Piedmontese Army and Giuseppe
Garibaldi's Red Shirt volunteers. And nothing
symbolized the new state more than the Royal
Italian Army, designed by War Minister Manfredo
Fanti to be "the school of the nation."
The Italian army grew rapidly after the
1859 war, with new formations raised in central
and northern Italy and others inducted from
the old Tuscan, Parmesan and Modenese armies.
Good officers proved to be in short supply,
and a series of mass promotions and crash
courses proved necessary to correct this deficit.
Fanti sent recruits to different parts of
the peninsula in hopes of using the army to
turn young Tuscans or Sicilians into Italians,
but most regiments retained their local character
in 1866. The melting pot would not show results
until much later. Fanti also introduced spaghetti,
until then the province solely of the Royal
Neapolitan Army, as the army's basic dinner
ration.
Fanti built the new army around the Armata
Sarda, the old Piedmontese army. The old army
had a reputation as a tough, professional
force and its officers considered themselves
far superior to those of the other Italian
states. The repeated defeats at the hands
of the Austrians had only exaggerated their
arrogance. Fanti relied almost exclusively
on his old officer corps, with only the formations
inducted wholesale into the new army showing
large numbers of non-Piedmontese officers.
Fanti resisted bringing in many officers from
Garibaldi's forces, and showed substantial
prejudice against leaders from the other Italian
states as well. After his resignation in the
summer of 1861, his successor Alfonso la Marmora
rolled back some of these measures. La Marmora
added a fourth regular battalion to each regiment,
and decreased their size while maintaining
the same number of officer billets. By finding
employment for all or most of the officers
left at loose ends after unification, La Marmora
hoped to rob potential resistance movements
of their leadership.
Politically, La Marmora's move has to be counted
as a success. But keeping so many politically
or professionally suspect officers, and promoting
many of them beyond their competence, gravely
diluted the quality of the Italian officer
corps. An Italian battalion was about half
the size of its Austrian counterpart in 1866,
and definitely not as well led. The system
proved disastrous in action. Yet even after
La Marmora's measures the army remained a
Piedmontese preserve, with 68 percent of its
officers but only about one-third of the rank
and file coming from the old kingdom.
The Italian officer corps of 1866 easily
possessed more combat experience than any
other army in Europe, with the possible exception
of their Austrian opponents. Unfortunately
for the new Royal Italian Army, its officers
had gained most of this experience fighting
against one another. The 12 division commanders
present at Custoza included King Victor Emanuel's
son Umberto, five generals from the old Armata
Sarda, one from the former Tuscan regular
army, three former generals of Garibaldi's
Red Shirts, one general from the former Neapolitan
regular army and the former War Minister of
the Kingdom of Naples. The new spirit of Italian
unity did not extend to the officer corps,
where resentment flared continually between
officers of different factions.
Mobilization
The Italian army called 483,087 men to the colors in 1866.
Additional forces eventually totaled 38,000
volunteers assembled by Garibaldi, 28,000
National Guardsmen and 20,000 cara-binieri,
the kingdom's militarized police. Italy's
military forces therefore slightly outnumbered
the total Austrian count and greatly outweighed
Austrian forces in the theater. Of the Italian
total, a large number — at first army
reservists, later National Guardsmen —
had to be stationed in the old Kingdom of
Naples to suppress the contadini rebellion
there. About 220,000 men initially went to
the field armies.
Mobilization proceeded smoothly, with less
than one percent of those called up failing
to respond, but problems abounded. Already
the army had failed to call up 40,000 new
recruits the previous year because it could
not afford to train them, and had shelved
plans to revamp the artillery. Even worse,
cash shortages had forced abandonment of a
desperately needed overhaul of the supply
services, which had proven woefully inadequate
in the 1848-49 and 1859 campaigns when servicing
the far smaller Armata Sarda. Infantry regiments
therefore did not call up most of their reservists.
Perhaps even more serious was a great shortage
of horses; the already overburdened supply
services faced a terrible shortfall in transport.
The Piedmontese cavalry had relied on foreign
mounts (chiefly North German) since early
in the century. The mounted branch suffered
even worse than the supply services when France
and the German states cut off exports of horses
in the spring of 1866, but it is doubtful
that the cash-strapped Italian state could
have afforded to import them even if they
had been available. While conscripted plow
horses could pull ammunition wagons well enough,
they could not take the place of carefully
trained cavalry chargers. The Italian cavalry
performed poorly in 1866 in both its scouting
and battle roles, due in no small part to
its poor-quality mounts.
When the 1866 war began, the contadini war
in southern Italy was entering its last stage.
Upon fleeing his kingdom in February 1861,
Frances II of Naples called on his people
to resist the Piedmontese. The new Italian
army's leading generals tried their hand at
stifling resistance — Alfonso la Marmora,
Enrico Cialdini, Raffaele Cadorna. Troop strength
grew to 100,000 by July, 1862, and the army
resorted to increasingly brutal tactics, destroying
villages and summarily executing armed peasants.
The army finally adapted to the guerrilla
struggle, and by 1865 had the region under
control.
A review of the deployment patterns of Royal
Italian regiments in the contadini struggle
shows a clear preference for using non-Piedmontese
regiments to take the brunt of the fighting.
Some of these same units would be the first
to break at Custoza, such as the former Tuscan
regiments of the Pisa Brigade. And the units
accused of committing atrocities against Austrian
prisoners were precisely those which had conducted
some of the most brutal operations of the
contadini war.
Leading the Army
Taking the newly-united army of a newly-united
kingdom into its first war would require the
utmost political skills, and so King Vittorio
Emanuele simply militarized his government
arrangements. The king would hold the army's
titular command, with La Marmora — now
holding the twin offices of prime minister
and foreign minister — as his chief
of staff and the de facto commander.
Popularly known as "Il Re Galantuomo"
for his overrated exploits in 1859, the king
knew his limitations and left the army's management
up to La Marmora. La Marmora had extensive
military experience, first gaining exposure
by crushing a revolt in Genoa in 1849. He
led the Piedmontese expeditionary corps in
the Crimean War, but declined command of the
Armata Sarda in 1859, retaining his post as
Minister of War.
In a letter to La Marmora dated 1 May 1866,
Enrico Cialdini, a highly-decorated veteran
of the 1848 and 1859 wars and conqueror of the
Papal States in 1860, insisted on an army-level
command, "no more and no less." Prodded
by War Minister Agostino Pettiti-Bagliani di
Roveto, La Marmora agreed to divide his forces
into two armies to preserve the army's fragile
political unity. The larger army, led by the
king and La Marmora, would form around Cremona.
The "Army of the Mincio" had a division
of heavy cavalry and three oversized corps,
each of four infantry divisions and a light
cavalry brigade. An Italian division had two
brigades, each in turn with two four-battalion
regiments and a Bersaglieri battalion, in all
about 8,000 to 10,000 men depending on the regiments'
state of mobilization — slightly more
than an Austrian brigade. An Italian battalion
had four companies. The Bersaglieri battalions
were often detached from their parent brigade
for special duties.
Cialdini led the smaller army, officially
known as IV Corps and informally as the Army
of the Lower Po. Mobilized around Bologna,
IV Corps had eight divisions and two light
cavalry brigades. Basing this army on Bologna
let it draw supplies from Emilia and Romagna,
sparing the overtaxed Italian supply system
in Lombardy.
The Royal Italian Army entered its first
war with overwhelming numerical superiority,
but a number of weaknesses which offset the
mathematics. If the bravery of the Italian
soldier could not be questioned, the professionalism
of his officers and the logistical infrastructure
of the rapidly-expanded army left much to
be desired. Whatever chance such an army had
to dislodge the Austrians from its fortresses
would soon be thrown away by spectacularly
inept planning and leadership.
Our Battles
of 1866 includes the disastrous Second
Battle of Custoza, where the new army's shortcomings
would be exposed despite the raw courage of
units like the Sardinia Grenadiers and a handful
of leaders like Giuseppe Salvator Pianell.
The Italian army is a powerful force, much
stronger than the Austrian Southern Army,
but poor organization and weak leadership
compensate for these advantages. The Italian
player can crush the Austrian, but has to
be patient enough to bring his forces to bear.
Depending on his insipid leaders to activate
at the proper moment is a fool's gamble.
Can you give the Italian
army the leadership it needs?
Order
Battles
of 1866 and
find out. |