Avalanche Press Homepage Avalanche Press Online Store


Search



ABOUT SSL CERTIFICATES

 
 

Cone of Fire: The Last Days?
By Mike Bennighof, Ph.D.
January 2014

Our only "hybrid" game covering two game systems, Cone of Fire is an odd duck in our game line. It's been that way since the earliest concepts for it, and I suppose it's only fitting that it seems to be finally going out of print in an odd fashion, too.

Cone of FireSince we published Cone of Fire, we've moved our warehouse twice. Once from Virginia to Alabama, and a second time a couple of years later, just a short distance away. Hard experience has shown that our inventory data wasn't reliable before the moves, and on top of that some stuff has gone missing: scattered, mis-labeled or just plain lost..

All that's to place a caveat on this next statement: I think that Cone of Fire is about to go permanently out of print. The game comes with three double-sided maps (the only ones in our lineup, more proof of the game's oddness) and three sheets of playing pieces. We have on hand right now four copies of Sheet 3 and about 50 of Sheet 1 - and several hundred of Sheet 2. There are also several hundred sets of maps, but only about three dozen game boxes.

I've searched through the supplies of game parts, and I think that's all that made it to Alabama. I could be wrong - temperatures have sunk into single digits this month even in Alabama and despite my innate cold resistance I grab any excuse to flee back into our nice warm office. But I think this game is just about done.

The games (and it really is two games inside one box) were interesting to design, but Cone of Fire was always a little disappointing to me as a game designer. I felt I'd stretched the concept too far, without yielding the sort of rich scenario mix the game should have had. It has plenty of scenarios - 42 total, 21 for each of the two games in the box - but it could have been better. For some reason I was determined not to include any pieces duplicated elsewhere in the series, except for those needed in the game's historical situations, and I believe that decision weakened the game. There should have been British, Americans, Germans and such in there to fight alongside or against the Argentines, Chileans and Brazilians.

What was left was still really good, though. And I do like seeing the development of South America's navies. Though Cone of Fire is billed as two games in one box, it's really more than that. In the Great War at Sea game, the ships and scenarios are divided into distinct eras: the Beagle Channel dispute at the turn of the century, the 1914 Battle of the Falklands and possible variations, and the great dreadnought race. You can see the fleets and their missions evolve. Likewise, the Second World War at Sea segment presents the fleets in distinct eras, including a post-war phase with helicopters and jets - some of the most advanced ships and planes in the entire series appear in this game.

Those scenarios come together to make up a pretty comprehensive look at Latin American naval history from the 1890s to the 1950s. I wanted to have similar scenarios in each time frame to show the developing technology, and also to get across the point that Latin America's political conflicts changed so little over six decades.

One prime location is the Cone of Fire itself, Tierra del Fuego. The three small islands at the eastern end of the Beagle Channel represented a serious challenge to Chilean and Argentine manhood from the late 1800s until very recently (and I am not convinced that current mutterings of friendship are all that heartfelt). Scenarios range from a struggle between two fleets of armored cruisers in 1899 on through a potential carrier battle in 1955 with Argentina fielding several squadrons of jets. There are troop landings, commerce raiding and terror bombardments. Chile has a major port right on the Strait of Magellan, while Argentina has a large base at Ushuaia on the southern shore of Tierra del Fuego.

The Strait itself, and the many channels nearby, create the most intricate terrain we've used in either naval game series. Fleets can play cat-and-mouse games in the channels, with coast-watchers constantly spotting them and the danger of becoming trapped in the maze always present.

The next hot spot is the Falkland Islands, another prime target of Argentine nationalism. Scenarios include Argentine attempts to take them, British attempts to take them back, and the efforts of both to supply their garrisons there. No actual invasions of the Falklands took place during this time frame, though both sides considered the question very seriously and made plans to take or defend them. The British at one point, in the panic that followed Pearl Harbor, even feared that the Japanese might sail around South America and grab the islands.

The third prime location is the Rio de la Plata estuary. During the first half of this century, it rivaled the waters off New York as the most heavily-trafficked destination for merchant shipping thanks to Argentina's booming agricultural exports. The Argentines get to defend their trade from Brazilians and British.

Along with the expected time frames (turn of the century, World War I, World War II, post-war), there's also a series of scenarios set around 1930. While I selected this as a period of Anglo-Argentine diplomatic rupture (Argentine nationalization of British oil firms was the catalyst, but the economic conflict ran much deeper than that), I also wanted to see some of the Royal Navy's older ships in Second World War at Sea garb.

There are some nice historical scenarios in each of the two games. For Great War at Sea, we have the hunt for Admiral Graf Spee's squadron, the Chilean hunt for the secret Royal Navy base in their southern archipelago, and the British hunt for the cruiser Dresden after the Battle of the Falklands. For Second World War at Sea there are the adventures of the German leader's namesake cruiser Admiral Graf Spee.

Cone of Fire is a fine game with a lot of unusual stuff inside the box. I regret not putting even more unusual stuff into two boxes instead; considering what current series developer Jim Stear did with Horn of Africa, each separate game would no doubt have had 60 or more scenarios. But what we did put in the box is still pretty cool.